WEALTH IN AMERICA

A People’s History of Who Had What, and Why It Changed

The Gilded Age to 1970 | Activism, Policy, Trust-Busting, & the Fight for Fairness

(Claude)

Introduction: What Is Wealth Distribution?

Imagine a pizza cut into 10 slices. Now imagine that one person at the table gets 6 slices, and the other nine people share the remaining 4. That is roughly how wealth was divided in the United States during the Gilded Age — a period from the 1870s to around 1900.

Wealth distribution describes how money, property, and resources are spread among people in a society. When a small group controls most of the wealth, we call that inequality. When resources are more evenly shared, we call that equality. The story of American wealth is the story of ordinary people — workers, farmers, small-business owners, women, and civil rights activists — who fought to make that pizza split a little more fairly.

This guide covers roughly 80 years of that fight, from the Gilded Age to 1970. Along the way we will pay special attention to two powerful tools Americans used: trust-busting (breaking up giant corporations that crushed competition) and laws that protected small businesses from being squeezed out by the very powerful.

Part 1: The Gilded Age (1870–1900)

What Was the Gilded Age?

The word “gilded” means covered in gold on the outside. The writer Mark Twain gave this era its name because he felt America looked shiny and prosperous on the surface — but underneath, millions of people struggled in poverty while a tiny group of men became richer than most countries.

Industrialization — the rapid growth of factories, railroads, and steel mills — created enormous new wealth. But the rules of the marketplace allowed a few powerful men to crush competitors and take almost all of that wealth for themselves.

The Robber Barons and the Rise of Monopolies

A small group of businessmen took control of entire industries. They are sometimes called “captains of industry” by admirers, but historians often call them “robber barons” because of how they treated workers and destroyed competitors — including thousands of small businesses.

What Is a Monopoly — and Why Does It Hurt Small Businesses?

A monopoly is when one company controls so much of an industry that other businesses can’t fairly compete. Think of it like a game of Monopoly where one player owns every property on the board before anyone else gets a turn.

Monopolies hurt small businesses in several ways. First, the big company can temporarily lower its prices below what it costs to produce a product — called “predatory pricing” — just long enough to drive the smaller competitor out of business. Then, with no competition left, the big company raises prices again. Second, monopolies can control the railroads, ports, and banks that small businesses depend on, squeezing them at every step. Third, monopolies can lobby government for rules that favor them and burden small competitors.

In the Gilded Age, small farmers, shopkeepers, and independent manufacturers found themselves at the mercy of giant corporations they had no power to resist. This is one reason the antitrust movement — the push to bust up these monopolies — grew so powerful.

The First Antitrust Law: The Sherman Act (1890)

By the late 1880s, public anger at monopolies had reached a boiling point. Farmers, small-business owners, and labor unions all pushed Congress to act. The result was the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 — the first major federal law designed to protect competition and prevent monopolies.

The Sherman Act made it illegal to form combinations or conspiracies that restrained trade, and it made monopolizing a market a federal crime. In theory, it was a powerful weapon. In practice, early enforcement was weak — courts often ruled in favor of big business, and the law went largely unenforced for over a decade.

The Counterpoint: Were the Robber Barons All Bad?

Some historians argue the Gilded Age industrialists created millions of jobs, connected the country, and gave away enormous sums — Carnegie alone funded over 2,500 libraries. But acts of charity don’t replace justice. Workers who built Carnegie’s fortune deserved fair wages by right, not as a gift. And small-business owners who were driven into bankruptcy by predatory pricing received no charity at all. A just economy creates fair rules; it doesn’t rely on the generosity of the powerful.

Part 2: The Progressive Era and the Age of Trust-Busting (1900–1920)

The People Push Back

By the early 1900s, a new wave of reform — called the Progressive Movement — swept the country. It included investigative journalists, labor organizers, women’s rights activists, and — crucially — small-business owners who were tired of being squeezed out by giant corporations. For the first time, the federal government began to take antitrust law seriously.

Theodore Roosevelt: The Trust-Buster

When Theodore Roosevelt became president in 1901, he inherited a country where giant corporations — called “trusts” — controlled railroads, steel, oil, and banking. Roosevelt believed that while big business was not always bad, monopolies that crushed competition and harmed ordinary people and small businesses had to be broken up.

Roosevelt used the Sherman Antitrust Act more aggressively than any president before him. His administration filed 44 antitrust suits in 7 years — earning him the nickname “The Trust-Buster.”

Major Trust-Busting Cases:

Woodrow Wilson and the “New Freedom”

When Woodrow Wilson ran for president in 1912, he offered a different vision of antitrust policy than Roosevelt. While Roosevelt believed in regulating big business, Wilson believed in breaking it up entirely — restoring what he called a level playing field for small businesses and independent entrepreneurs.

Wilson called his program the “New Freedom” — the idea that true liberty required an economy open to competition, where a small-business owner had a fair chance against a giant corporation. He argued that concentrated economic power was just as dangerous as concentrated political power.

Wilson’s Key Antitrust Reforms:

• Clayton Antitrust Act (1914): Closed loopholes in the Sherman Act. It specifically banned price discrimination — where a big company charges small businesses more than large ones for the same product — and banned “tying arrangements” that forced small retailers to carry only one company’s goods.
• Federal Trade Commission Act (1914): Created the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), a permanent government agency with the power to investigate and stop unfair business practices. Small businesses finally had somewhere to file complaints against corporations that were crushing them.
• The FTC’s early years: The new agency investigated and halted practices like false advertising, predatory pricing, and exclusive dealing arrangements that locked small retailers out of markets.

The Muckrakers: Journalism as Activism

A group of investigative journalists called “muckrakers” exposed the realities behind America’s shiny industrial image — and their work fueled public demand for antitrust action.

• Ida Tarbell’s The History of the Standard Oil Company (1904) revealed how Rockefeller systematically destroyed small independent refiners — using secret railroad rebates, industrial espionage, and predatory pricing.
• Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle (1906) revealed horrific conditions in meatpacking plants, leading to the Pure Food and Drug Act — which also included protections for small food producers against adulteration by large processors.
• Louis Brandeis, a lawyer and later Supreme Court Justice, wrote Other People’s Money (1914), arguing that the concentration of financial power in a few Wall Street banks was strangling the ability of small businesses and local banks to function independently.

The Labor Movement and Small Business: An Unlikely Alliance

Workers and small-business owners might seem like very different groups, but in the Progressive Era they often shared a common enemy: the giant corporation. A local shop owner who paid fair wages could not compete with a factory that paid poverty wages. This is one reason some small-business associations actually supported labor reforms like minimum wage laws — because a floor on wages leveled the playing field.

• The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire (1911): 146 garment workers — mostly young immigrant women — died because owners had locked exit doors. This tragedy galvanized support for labor laws and also for stricter regulation of large industrial employers.
• The Coal Strike of 1902: President Roosevelt intervened to help miners win better pay — one of the first times the federal government sided with workers over big business owners.

Government Policy Expands

• Sherman Antitrust Act (1890, enforced from 1901): Made monopolies illegal.
• 16th Amendment (1913): Created the federal income tax, for the first time taxing the wealthy at higher rates.
• Federal Reserve Act (1913): Created a central banking system that made credit more accessible to small businesses, not just to those with connections to J.P. Morgan.
• Clayton Antitrust Act (1914): Banned price discrimination, tying contracts, and interlocking directorates that gave big corporations unfair advantages.
• Federal Trade Commission (1914): Gave small businesses a government agency to turn to when large corporations cheated or bullied them.
• Workers’ Compensation laws: By 1920, most states required employers to compensate injured workers — the first social safety net.

Part 3: The Roaring Twenties, the Crash, and the New Deal (1920–1939)

The Boom: Who Was Roaring?

The 1920s saw explosive economic growth. Cars, radios, and refrigerators created exciting new industries. The stock market soared. But the antitrust progress of the Progressive Era was largely reversed. The administrations of Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover believed big business should be left alone — a philosophy called “laissez-faire” (French for “let it do”).

The FTC became toothless. Mergers surged: between 1919 and 1930, more than 8,000 American businesses merged into larger ones. Chain stores — the Walmarts of their day — rapidly spread, threatening independent retailers across the country. By 1929, chain stores made up about 20% of all retail sales, up from nearly zero in 1900.

Tax cuts for the wealthy (championed by Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon) meant the top income tax rate fell from 73% in 1921 to 24% by 1929. The top 1% of earners received about 23% of all income by 1928.

The Small Business Crisis: Chain Stores vs. Independent Retailers

One of the great economic battles of the 1920s and 1930s was between independent “mom and pop” retailers and the growing chain store empires — companies like A&P grocery stores, Woolworth’s, and later Sears. Chain stores could buy goods in huge quantities at steep discounts, then sell them at prices that small stores simply could not match.

By the mid-1930s, the A&P grocery chain alone operated over 15,000 stores and had more revenue than many countries. Independent grocers, hardware store owners, and pharmacists lobbied Congress desperately for protection.

• Robinson-Patman Act (1936): This law, specifically designed to protect small retailers, made it illegal for suppliers to charge small stores more than large chain stores for the same product. It was a direct response to chain stores using their buying power to undercut small competitors.
• Miller-Tydings Act (1937): Allowed manufacturers to set minimum retail prices, preventing large stores from using loss-leader pricing (selling products at a loss to drive competitors out of business).

The Crash: October 1929

On October 29, 1929 — “Black Tuesday” — the stock market collapsed. Billions of dollars of wealth evaporated in hours. Banks failed. Businesses closed. By 1933, one in four American workers was unemployed. The Great Depression exposed how fragile prosperity built on speculation and inequality really was.

Small businesses were hit especially hard. With credit unavailable and customers broke, millions of independent shops, farms, and small manufacturers went under. Many were then bought up by larger corporations at pennies on the dollar — further concentrating economic power.

FDR and the New Deal

Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected in 1932 promising a “New Deal.” The New Deal was not one program but dozens — designed to put people back to work, regulate banks and markets, build a social safety net, and address the monopoly problem that had helped cause the Depression.

New Deal Programs That Helped Workers and Small Businesses:

New Deal Antitrust: Thurman Arnold and the Comeback of Enforcement

After a period in the early New Deal when large industrial cartels were actually encouraged (under the National Recovery Administration, which was later struck down by the Supreme Court), FDR appointed Thurman Arnold to head the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department in 1938.

Arnold launched the most aggressive antitrust enforcement campaign in American history up to that point. His division filed more antitrust cases in five years than had been filed in the previous 48 years combined. He targeted industries from oil to movie theaters to building materials — all of which had used monopolistic practices to squeeze out small competitors and overcharge consumers.

Part 4: World War II and the Postwar Boom (1940–1960)

The War Economy and Shared Sacrifice

World War II transformed the American economy. Massive government spending on the war effort put almost everyone back to work. Unemployment fell from 14% in 1940 to 1% by 1944. Women entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers. Black Americans migrated north and west for factory jobs.

Top income tax rates reached 94% for the very wealthy during the war — a deliberate policy to fund the effort while preventing a small group from profiting excessively from national sacrifice.

The GI Bill (1944): A Springboard — For Some

When soldiers came home, the GI Bill provided college education, job training, low-cost home mortgages, and — crucially — small business loans to veterans. Millions of returning servicemen used GI Bill loans to open small businesses: garages, diners, hardware stores, farms. This was one of the largest government investments in small business formation in American history.

The Postwar Economy: The Great Compression

Economists call the period from roughly 1945 to 1973 “the Great Compression” — when wealth inequality decreased significantly. Union membership peaked at about 35% of the workforce. The minimum wage, in today’s dollars, was near its all-time high. A CEO earned about 20 times what the average worker earned — compared to over 350 times today.

Antitrust enforcement remained active throughout the 1950s. The Celler-Kefauver Act (1950) closed a loophole in antitrust law that had allowed large companies to quietly buy up smaller competitors’ assets without triggering review. The act strengthened merger oversight and helped prevent the quiet re-concentration of industry that had occurred in the 1920s.

Small businesses thrived in the postwar era. Suburbanization created demand for new shops, services, and local contractors. Access to credit, the GI Bill’s small business loans, and robust antitrust enforcement meant that a small operator had a genuine chance to compete.

The Counterpoint: Who Was Left Out of the Boom?

The postwar prosperity was real — but deeply unequal. The median Black family’s income was less than 60% of the median white family’s throughout the 1950s. Mexican farmworkers in the Southwest worked in conditions barely different from the Gilded Age. Women who had flooded into the workforce during the war were pushed back into domestic roles. Betty Friedan would call this “the problem that has no name” in her 1963 book The Feminine Mystique. And Black-owned small businesses, systematically excluded from suburban growth and denied the same loans and protections offered to white-owned businesses, fell further behind.

Part 5: Civil Rights, the Great Society, and Economic Justice (1960–1970)

The Civil Rights Movement and Economic Justice

The Civil Rights Movement fought against legal segregation — but its leaders consistently argued that political rights without economic rights were incomplete. Martin Luther King Jr. said near the end of his life: “What does it profit a man to be able to eat at an integrated lunch counter if he doesn’t earn enough money to buy a hamburger?”

Economic exclusion operated through formal law (segregation, redlining, discriminatory loan policies) and through informal power (banks that refused Black applicants, suppliers that refused to sell to Black-owned businesses, landlords that refused commercial space to Black entrepreneurs). The Civil Rights Movement fought all of it.

• The Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, or national origin — protecting workers and also making it illegal to refuse to do business with someone because of their race.
• The Voting Rights Act of 1965 removed barriers that had kept Black Americans from voting — and from influencing the local governments that controlled business licenses, zoning, and contracts.
• Executive Order 11246 (1965) required federal contractors to take affirmative action in hiring minority workers — the first time the government used its purchasing power to combat discrimination in employment.
• The Fair Housing Act of 1968 made it illegal to discriminate in selling or renting housing — and by extension, commercial properties. Black entrepreneurs could now more easily rent the storefronts they had previously been denied.

The Great Society Programs

President Lyndon B. Johnson declared a “War on Poverty” in 1964 and pushed through the most sweeping expansion of social programs since the New Deal.

• Medicare and Medicaid (1965): Health insurance for the elderly and for low-income Americans. Before this, illness could bankrupt a small-business owner or their workers instantly.
• Head Start (1965): Early childhood education and nutrition for low-income children — recognizing that inequality starts at birth and that equal opportunity requires equal preparation.
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965): First major federal school funding, directing money to schools in poor areas. Education is the original small-business investment.
• Small Business Administration Expansion: The SBA, created in 1953, was significantly expanded in the 1960s to provide more loans and technical assistance to small businesses — including, for the first time, targeted programs for minority-owned small businesses.
• Economic Opportunity Act (1964): Created job training, community action programs, and local economic development organizations — putting resources directly into poor communities to help them build economic capacity.
• Truth in Lending Act (1968): Required lenders to clearly disclose interest rates and loan terms — protecting small-business borrowers and consumers from hidden fees and predatory lending practices.

Antitrust in the 1960s: Protection for the Little Guy

The 1960s saw some of the most aggressive enforcement of antitrust laws specifically aimed at protecting small businesses and local markets. The Supreme Court in this era took a strongly pro-competition stance, striking down mergers that would have hurt small retailers even if the combined companies were not enormous.

• Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S. (1962): The Supreme Court blocked a shoe company merger, ruling that even if the combined company had a small market share nationally, the merger would hurt small independent shoe retailers locally. The Court specifically said protecting small businesses from being driven out by chains was a legitimate goal of antitrust law.
• United States v. Von’s Grocery (1966): The Supreme Court blocked a grocery chain merger in Los Angeles even though the combined stores would have had only 7.5% of the local market — because independent grocery stores were rapidly disappearing and the Court wanted to preserve competition.

These decisions were sometimes criticized as too aggressive — and later courts would reverse course. But they reflected a clear philosophy: antitrust law is not just about prices; it is about preserving the kind of competitive economy where small businesses can survive.

The Results: Did It Work?

The data is striking. The poverty rate fell from 22.4% in 1959 to 12.6% in 1970. Life expectancy rose. Infant mortality fell. More Americans graduated from high school and college than ever before. The racial income gap narrowed — not because discrimination had ended, but because new laws and programs created pathways that had not existed before.

Small business formation remained high throughout the 1960s. Antitrust enforcement kept markets open. The minimum wage gave workers money to spend in local shops. Government programs invested in communities that the private market had ignored.

Conclusion: What We Learn From 80 Years

From the Gilded Age to 1970, the story of American wealth distribution is the story of a struggle — and of the specific tools that made a difference. When government enforced antitrust laws, monopolies were broken up and small businesses could compete. When workers organized into unions, wages rose and money flowed into local economies. When Congress protected small retailers from chain store pricing tricks, the corner shop had a fighting chance. When the government invested in education, health care, and housing, ordinary people could build something.

The periods of greatest equality in American history — particularly the postwar era from the 1940s to the 1970s — were built on: strong antitrust enforcement, high taxes on great wealth, robust small business support, significant public investment in shared goods, and laws that tried to extend opportunity to more people.

The periods of greatest inequality — the Gilded Age, the 1920s, and again after 1980 — followed the weakening of those same tools.

That is not a coincidence. It is a pattern. And patterns can be changed — if people understand them.

References & Further Reading

All sources listed below are free online or widely available in public libraries. This list has been expanded to include sources specifically on antitrust history and small business policy.

Discussion Questions for Students

1. What is a monopoly? Can you think of any companies today that might be so big they limit competition for smaller businesses?

2. Why do you think Theodore Roosevelt was called the “Trust-Buster”? Do you think it was good or bad for the country when he broke up Standard Oil?

3. The Robinson-Patman Act tried to protect small grocery stores from big chain stores. Do you think government should protect small businesses from larger competitors? Why or why not?

4. The GI Bill helped millions of veterans — but not equally. How did racial discrimination shape who got to benefit from government programs?

5. Ida Tarbell investigated Standard Oil because it destroyed her father’s small business. How did her personal experience shape her journalism? Can you think of an issue that affects your community that someone should investigate?

6. The periods of greatest equality in America came with strong antitrust laws, unions, and public investment. The periods of greatest inequality came when those were weakened. What does that pattern suggest to you?

Back to Sweep the Midterms