Wealth Freed up by Ending Trickle Down

  • ChatGPT shows here that by raising our Taxes/GDP by 4% we could fund world class benefits.
  • That would make our Taxes/GDP = 29%
  • The average Taxes/GDP in OECD nations (our peers) is 34%
  • Think what we could do if we raised the Taxes/GDP another 5%
    • for one thing we could ease the pain that AI and automation are causing to our labor force.
  • and became only average.

________________

Definitions: OECD, Housing Choice Vouchers, BBB, NIIT Gap, ACA

________________

(ChatGPT)

Fiscal Policy ▪ End of Trickle-Down → World-Class Benefits

Ending Trickle-Down: Funding a Great Nation

Goal: Replace the era of tax breaks at the top with fair taxation and world-class public benefits for all Americans.

1) What “Ending Trickle-Down” Means

Definition: Reverse or close tax preferences that disproportionately benefit the top — capital-gains discounts, step-up in basis, pass-through gaps, deep corporate cuts — and strengthen the base.

Why it matters: The U.S. raises only ≈ 25 % of GDP in taxes vs. ≈ 34 % OECD average. Reclaiming even 2–4 % of GDP ($600 B–$1.2 T per year) creates the fiscal room peers use for modern benefits.

2) 2025-Scale Revenue from Ending Trickle-Down

ReformEst. Annual RevenueCore Source
Equalize tax rates on capital gains & qualified dividends≈ $114 B / yrTreasury Tax Expenditures FY 2025
End “step-up in basis” at death (tax gains or carryover)≈ $23–57 B / yrCBO / CRFB options
Close NIIT gap on high-income pass-throughs≈ $44 B / yrCBO / CRFB
Raise corporate rate 21 % → 28 %≈ $95 B / yrCBO options
Subtotal (baseline)≈ $293 B / yr
Loophole + base-erosion fixes (intl.)→ $300–$400 B / yrComposite
Move toward OECD average (+ 2–4 % GDP)→ $600 B–$1.2 T / yrOECD Revenue Statistics

Estimates are order-of-magnitude and depend on design & behavioral response.

3) What That Can Buy

Package A — Immediate, visible improvements (≈ $300–$400 B / yr)

ProgramAnnual CostDescription
Paid family & medical leave (≈ 12 wks)≈ $20 BPartial wage replacement (CBO)
Enhanced ACA premium subsidies≈ $35 BMake enhanced credits permanent
Universal pre-K (federal share)≈ $11 BState partnerships
Affordable child care (≤ 7 % income cap)≈ $60–70 BBBB-style baseline
Restore expanded Child Tax Credit≈ $100–120 B2021 structure, monthly
Medicare dental, vision & hearing≈ $30–40 BAdd long-neglected coverage
Housing Choice Vouchers (½-scale)≈ $50–60 BServe ~½ of eligible renters
Free community college (federal share)≈ $8–15 BAmerica’s College Promise model
Total≈ $306–356 B / yrWithin the $300–$400 B lane

Package B — World-Class Breadth (≈ $750–$950 B / yr ≈ 3–3.5 % GDP)

Add-OnAnnual CostDescription
Universal Housing Choice Vouchers+$118 BServe all eligible renters
Deeper child-care guarantee+$30–40 BUniversal ≤ 7 % income cap
Strengthen ACA (0-premiums / tight OOP caps)+$25–40 BLow-income relief
Senior cost-sharing relief (Parts B/D)+$20–30 BBeyond dental/vision/hearing
Tuition-free public undergraduate (first-dollar)+$60–100 BFederal ≈ ⅔, states ≈ ⅓
Total≈ $750–950 B / yrComparable to high-benefit OECD peers

4) Free Higher Education — Quick View

LevelFederal Cost / yrNotes
Community College (2-yr)$8–15 BAmerica’s College Promise models; cost varies by state uptake
Public Undergraduate (4-yr, first-dollar)$60–100 B“College for All” style; federal ≈ 67 %, states ≈ 33 %

5) What Is “Major Voucher Expansion”?

The Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program currently serves only ≈ 1 in 4 eligible households. A “major expansion” means scaling toward most or all eligible renters:

  • Half-scale (fits Package A): + $50–60 B / yr
  • Universal (Package B): + $118 B / yr → ≈ 9 M people lifted above poverty

6) Bottom Line — Fiscal Perspective

Measured as a share of GDP, these options fit comfortably within normal democratic budgets:

  • Package A (≈ $300–$400 B / yr): ≈ 1.0–1.3 % of GDP. Raises U.S. tax revenue from ≈ 25 % → ≈ 26–26.5 % of GDP — still well below the ≈ 34 % OECD average.
  • Package B (≈ $750–$950 B / yr): ≈ 2.7–3.4 % of GDP. Would lift U.S. revenues toward 28–29 % of GDP — similar to Canada (33 %) or the U.K. (31 %), and below Nordic levels (35–38 %).

In short: Ending trickle-down could fund a world-class suite of benefits while keeping the U.S. a low-tax economy by global standards. What we lack is not money — but political will.

Printable References (Copyable URLs)

  1. Treasury Tax Expenditures FY 2025 (PDF): https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/131/Tax-Expenditures-FY2025.pdf
  2. CBO Budget Options 2025–2034: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60557
  3. CRFB – CBO’s Revenue Options Summary: https://www.crfb.org/blogs/cbos-revenue-savings-options
  4. OECD Revenue Statistics 2024: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/11/revenue-statistics-2024_6e88b46e.html
  5. CBO – Paid Family & Medical Leave (2021): https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57631
  6. CBO/JCT – ACA premium tax credits overview (PDF): https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2025-09/61734-Health.pdf
  7. CRS – Universal Pre-K brief (IN11751): https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IN/PDF/IN11751/IN11751.13.pdf
  8. CBO – Child Care/Pre-K analysis (BBB context): https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57630
  9. PGPF – Costs of expanding CTC & EITC: https://www.pgpf.org/article/what-are-the-costs-of-permanently-expanding-the-ctc-and-the-eitc
  10. Brookings – Medicare dental/hearing/vision options: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/options-for-containing-the-cost-of-a-new-medicare-dental-hearing-and-vision-benefit/
  11. KFF – Medicare dental/hearing/vision coverage: https://www.kff.org/health-costs/dental-hearing-and-vision-costs-and-coverage-among-medicare-beneficiaries-in-traditional-medicare-and-medicare-advantage/
  12. Urban Institute (2023) – Housing Vouchers & Poverty (PDF): https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/How%20Much%20Could%20Full%20Funding%20and%20Use%20of%20Housing%20Choice%20Vouchers%20Reduce%20Poverty.pdf
  13. CBPP – Policy Basics: Housing Choice Vouchers: https://www.cbpp.org/research/housing/policy-basics-the-housing-choice-voucher-program
  14. America’s College Promise (House Ed & Workforce): https://edworkforce.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399161
  15. CBO – College Affordability Act Score (2019): https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2019-12/hr4674.pdf
  16. EducationData.org – How Much Would Free College Cost (2025): https://educationdata.org/how-much-would-free-college-cost
  17. Sanders “College for All” Fact Sheet: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/college-for-all-fact-sheet-2019.pdf
  18. NCES – Postsecondary Institution Revenues: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cud/postsecondary-institution-revenue
  19. SHEEO – State Higher Education Finance FY 2024: https://sheeo.org/shef_fy24/

Tip: Use your browser’s Print dialog for a clean copy. All URLs are plain text for easy copy-and-paste.

Back to “Overthrow Rule by money” email

Back to Flier

Back to “Game Plan” email

Back to “Game Plan” flier